The Atomic Bomb Essay. In this paper, it will be discussed why the Atomic Bomb is the biggest method of destruction known to man. The paper will be discussing the results of the Atomic Bombs, along with the effects years after the initial explosion. People always wonder how many people actually died in the two Persuasive Essay On Atomic Bomb Words | 7 Pages. in Harry Truman as the current president when we took the move to bomb the two cities. To get the revenge that the United States had been wanting on Japan for 4 years, we decided to drop atomic bombs at daybreak. It was a move that would have a lasting impression · In , at the urging of government officials worried about the growing number of people puzzled by the use of the bomb, Stimson wrote an article titled “The decision to use the atomic bomb”. 7 He argued that the decision to drop the atomic bomb on Hiroshima was made only after vigilant deliberation by Truman and his advisers of all the courses of action open to
History Atomic Bomb Essay Example For Students - words | Artscolumbia
The reason why the United States was compelled to employ the use of a more lethal weapon in Hiroshima and Nagasaki in Japan has been at the heart of many scholarly writings, essay on atomic bomb. The question is, essay on atomic bomb, why did the United States decide to engage a deadly attack and yet there was a league of nations charged with conflict resolution?
The idealists came up with an international organization in the name of the League of Nations to address problems of war. The use of atomic bomb therefore was shaped by international variables such as scientific research and discoveries. Causes to any phenomena are multi-dimensional meaning that they should be studied in a multi-disciplinary way such as geographically, psychologically, politically and economically.
It therefore follows that causes to the use of atomic bomb in Japan should be divided into particular and profound causes. Particular causes are those that are immediate while profound causes are underlying issues. Historians are interested with immediate causes of war while political scientists try to explore long-term causes but both will be dealt with in this study. Taylor examined that war is like a road accident because it has the immediate causes such as over speeding as well as long-term causes such as the nature roads.
Scholars have been interested in both immediate and underlying causes for application of atomic bomb in Hiroshima, essay on atomic bomb. The application of the strategy did not have a single cause because WWII had roots in the society and the then international system. Quency wright in his works about study of war vol.
War is as old as human existence and characterizes the nature of human beings. A clear relationship exists between human nature and conflict. ST Augustine claimed that war is part of society and human life because of sin, man exhibits love for hurtful things and vain which constitutes the source of human conflict, essay on atomic bomb. Benedict de Spinoza observes in a short article called political treatise that war occurs because man is led by passion not reason hence there is a conflict between passion and reason.
Confucius on his part postulated that there is deceit and cunningness among human beings leading to war thus war is an innate factor in human beings. John Stoessinger claimed that people are victims of their own perceptional limitations because they are limited in their comprehension of natural phenomena and hence are bound to make wrong judgments. This paper examines the particular and profound causes that made the United States to utilize the atomic bomb in Japan.
The United States applied atomic bombs on Japan in order to force the Japanese officials to cease-fire, essay on atomic bomb. It invaded Japan because of the desire to subdue it and cut short the war.
Japan made its own land a battlefield without taking into consideration the social welfare of its citizens. The U. had to put to an end to what Japan was planning because if it went ahead with its plans, more than one million Americans and Britons would have lost their lives. Dropping of atomic bomb in Hiroshima is said to have solved many humanitarian problems because many people could have died could Japan have attacked the U, essay on atomic bomb.
There has been a heated debate over the American verdict of using a weapons of mass destruction on Hiroshima. President Truman never considered it a big issue. Losses in an attack of Japan would have been great. The bomb was meant to soften Japanese stance and make it to abandon war plans.
Indeed the bomb-facilitated negotiations among Japanese officials since they noticed that war had more implications on them than any other person. Earlier attempts to put to an end the war by use of nuclear weapons had failed to bear fruits as Essay on atomic bomb military were not willing to back off the fight. This forced the U. to use atomic bombs since it perceived that many lives would be lost if Japan continued with the war. It is believed that, President Harry Truman used atomic bombs on Japan as a way of intimidating Stalin so that he could keep him out of the war.
However, the general officers did not approve this move and they denounced their commander-in-chief. In late October, General MacArthur went back to the Philippine island of Layette. The Japanese started to use kamikaze pilots in an anxious attempt to obliterate Allied ships.
Quite a few more bloody battles waited ahead for American forces, essay on atomic bomb. Americas recorded more than twenty five thousand fatalities at the mêlée of Iwo Jima and another fifty thousand at the encounter of Okinawa.
After these battles, though, nothing was left to stop an Allied invasion of Japan. These extremely bloody battles deeply disturbed military officials who were planning for an attack of Japan.
Japanese resistance to such an attack would have been fervent, essay on atomic bomb. President Truman was informed about the new scientific development in after the death of Roosevelt in Manhattan project was erected in specifically to develop an atomic bomb. The bomb was manufactured in Los Alamos, New Mexico with J. Robert Oppenheimer as the director. The effectiveness and efficiency of the weapon was first experienced in Mexico desert in The bomb did not contribute much to the end of Japanese aggression since it only increased the speed of surrender because the officials had already begun engaging in surrender talks.
Long before the dropping of the bombs, Japanese leaders were determined to surrender and were taking steps toward ending the war. The United States secretary of war Stimson was much concerned with deliberations on the use of the bomb due its effects. He argued that the decision to drop the atomic bomb on Hiroshima was made only after vigilant essay on atomic bomb by Truman and his advisers of all the courses of action open to them to end the war at the lowest possible cost. However, the question arose as to whether there was anything like a decision to use the bombs, or whether Truman and his advisers were carried along by events.
The bombs cost more than two billion dollars, and required the work of scores of top scientists, essay on atomic bomb, thousands of workers and several industrial firms. After all this time and spending, Truman had to use the atomic bombs at one time and the war proved to be the best time to use them.
The dropping of the second bomb gave the impression of having its own momentum. Prevalent detestation of and vengeance against the Japanese for the bombing of Pearl Harbor may have produced the impetus for dropping the atomic bombs, essay on atomic bomb. To many Americans, including Truman, it warranted almost any act against it in vengeance.
Expressing his feeling of revenge, Truman said in a private letter written soon after the bombing of Nagasaki, that nobody was more bothered by the use of the atomic bombs than essay on atomic bomb was, but he was deeply troubled over the uncalled-for attack by the Japanese on Pearl Harbor.
dominance in the already brewing Soviet-American disagreement, which has, of course, prearranged the postwar worldwide order. Their analyses of planning for the postwar world, from forward, underline official description of the Soviet Union as the primary menace to U. primacy in world affairs. Nonetheless, while the U. hegemony, and both were sufficiently served by dropping the atomic bomb. The bombings precipitated the end to Second World War because leaders were shocked even though they were still reluctant to surrender.
The deaths did not go down well with the emperor who took an extra step of urging political leaders to cease-fire and agree to talk with the rest of the world. The emperor was essay on atomic bomb because he was both a temporal and spiritual leader.
He could be reached in the times of crisis to provide advices and directions. Japan was reported to be preparing weapons of mass destruction such as chemical bombs. The weapons were on the wrong hands according to the United States government.
Japan was an aggressive state that would use the weapons in unjustifiable ways such as revenging against innocent people. The United States president, Truman, felt that Americans were going to be affected most and hence there was a reason to intervene before things got worse.
Americans had been casualties of Japanese recklessness and President Truman knew that anything was possible with Japan because they were determined to go on with war. The only way that would guarantee mass happiness in the United States and other allied states was to attack the destroyer before it could strike.
Many Americans had lost their lives and properties and the government was unhappy with that, it was its mandate to ensure that no more destruction could be carried out to its people. The American government saw Japan as a threat essay on atomic bomb its quest for attaining natural resources in the region.
The United States wanted to access the region but Japan was a threat because of conflicting interests. The World War II provided an opportunity that saw essay on atomic bomb United States weaken the competitor.
This was seen as territorial aggrandizement because the United States was unhappy with the way Japan controlled the territory full of natural resources. The only way to scare the enemy was to apply weapons of mass destruction to its citizens, essay on atomic bomb.
The United States was not after making peace because the administrators of Japan were in Tokyo but the bombs were dropped kilometers away, essay on atomic bomb.
Japan was forced to surrender and promised never to engage in military aggression. The United States was trying to reduce its opponents in its pursuit to global domination. The Japanese could have worsened things could they have been left to go on with their weapon formation.
The United States is always known to be a self-glorious nation. The war provided a good opportunity essay on atomic bomb them to demonstrate to the whole world what they had achieved in the world of science. Talking about it alone could not be essay on atomic bomb since other states such as Russia and China could not believe. The war provided a good chance for them to apply practically whatever they had.
Other states could believe in their allegations and live according to their wishes lest they experience the same. The bomb could be applied to any aggressor but Japan was chosen because it was a major competitor. President Truman therefore opted for the bomb to achieve glory for Americans hence fostering nationalism. Americans today view themselves as the most united people mainly because of common history created by leaders such as Truman.
America had other means of stopping the war but they never thought about them since they saw application of the bomb to be serving a number of reasons. Application of the bomb therefore was meant to serve self-interests and wishes not the will of the majority; it only served the appetites of Americans not the whole world as it was thought.
At this point, long term issues are discussed such as the behavior of leaders both in the American government and Japanese government, essay on atomic bomb, the political climates in both states, societal variables such as ethnic composition, institutional structure of governments that is the roles played by various leaders and finally the international system. We analyze how the variables contributed in the application of the atomic bomb to Hiroshima, Japan. The causes associated with these variables are observed over a particular time since they are not immediate, essay on atomic bomb.
Some critics of the application of the bomb argue that United Essay on atomic bomb was sending a message to communist states urging them to beware of what capitalists can do. The arguments are accurate to some extent because during preparation of the bomb, no communist state was involved instead it was only Canada and United Kingdom all of which are capitalists. The United States could not have applied the bomb to an aggressive capitalist state.
Hiroshima: Was the atomic bomb necessary? - UpFront
, time: 2:34Atomic Bomb Essay Examples - Free Research Papers on blogger.com
The atomic bomb was “the beginning of a horrific change in human history because the world would soon have to live with the fact that nuclear weapons could destroy civilization itself.” The United States ought to have demonstrated its power to Japan by bombing an unpopulated area rather than a high populated city Persuasive Essay On Atomic Bomb Words | 7 Pages. in Harry Truman as the current president when we took the move to bomb the two cities. To get the revenge that the United States had been wanting on Japan for 4 years, we decided to drop atomic bombs at daybreak. It was a move that would have a lasting impression The American Atomic attacks on Hiroshima and Nagasaki were strategically justified as using the atomic bomb would satisfy the U.S.’s end of war military and political agenda. This essay will explain in precise detail the tasks and challenges the USA needed to complete in order to. Read More. Words: - Pages: 6
No comments:
Post a Comment